Conwell's 'Acres Of Diamonds'
Conwell begins his speech speaking of how many men make the same mistake when it comes to attaining wealth. Conwell gives many stories and examples of which this has happened. He believes that this universal mistake is not investigating into the surrounding society. For instance, a man creating a business within a society in which there are already many businesses in that area that sell the same thing. Whereas, a man that can understand the needs of a society and create a business accordingly can generate a lot more wealth. In reference to the "acres of diamonds" he is suggested there are immense amount of chances to become prosper but you just have to know how. Conwell's solution of wealth and poverty is believed to be in the understanding ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...Whereas, Conwell stresses the idea that wealth is everywhere and there is a vast amount of it, however, who attains it lays in knowledge and opportunity. The differing perspectives are due to their contrasting priorities of life and life motives. Kuyper extenuates that his priority is his faith. Because of his beliefs, his view on poverty is shaped by it. All of his ideals in "The Problem of Poverty" is defending with a Christian perspective and Biblical references. His motive in life is to fulfill the calling of a Christian, and he believes one of these callings is to help others, such as those who live in poverty. Conwell's priorities differ greatly influencing his theories on the subject matter of wealth and poverty. He prioritizes hard work and knowledge compared to religion. Since his morals are based on these, he believes poverty is self–conflicted or the doing of someone rather than circumstance. Poverty in his eyes is easily solved in his eyes with knowledge. Alternatively, to Kuyper's idea of overcoming poverty with the help of others, Conwell is an individualistic issue and can be solved by the individual themselves. This is attainable through knowledge and taking opportunities presented. Kuyper stresses the value of money and the power it has, whereas Kuyper dejects the materialistic side of money and discourages the love humans have for
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
No comments:
Post a Comment