Rhetorical Analysis Of The Perils Of Indifference

Rhetorical Analysis Of The Perils Of Indifference

A Rhetorical Analysis of "The Perils of Indifference" Distinguished Jewish writer and Holocaust survivor, Elie Wiesel, in his speech, "The Perils of Indifference", discusses the effects indifference has on one's humanity in both? societal and individual terms. Wiesel's purpose is to illustrate the plight of those who suffer because of indifference and to appeal to the audience's consciences. He adopts a sympathetic, haunting, and accusatory tone in order to convey to audiences that society had not learned and many victims have and will continue to suffer injustices because of indifference. Ultimately, through the means of syntax devices such as juxtaposition, anaphora, diction, and rhetorical questioning, Weisel bolsters the supporting logic of his claim that indifference is a grave malady of humanity and to amend such an ailment one must look no further than the self. Wiesel's comprehensive speech, "The Perils of Indifference" can be divided into three definitive sections: the contextualization of the suffering that occurs both past and present, an explication of "indifference", and lastly Wiesel's earnest undertaking and rhetorical questioning of why we practice indifference. In view of this classification, the first step Wiesel takes is to properly address his audience and the authority individuals such as the President, Mrs. Clinton, Ambassadors, congress members possess. This, in and of itself, allows Wiesel to establish a sincere and concise tone. As Wiesel

... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...